Difference between revisions of "User talk:Inquisitor S."
Lord Parvus (talk | contribs) |
Lord Parvus (talk | contribs) (→Welcomes) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Please read the following: [[Talk:List of Space Marine Chapters#This list contains several mistakes - we should deleted it and rewrite it anew]]. Thanks. [[User:Aehren|Aehren]] 04:18, 5 August 2011 (CEST) | Please read the following: [[Talk:List of Space Marine Chapters#This list contains several mistakes - we should deleted it and rewrite it anew]]. Thanks. [[User:Aehren|Aehren]] 04:18, 5 August 2011 (CEST) | ||
| − | == | + | ==Welcome & Kestrel is back fluffing things up== |
I understand your point of view and I will stop as requested. | I understand your point of view and I will stop as requested. | ||
Revision as of 02:40, 8 August 2011
You're going to have to be a little more specific here. Where exactly do I go wrong?
Here's my standing of the page:
100px
The page had no sources until I added them and unless video-media convension had changed in the last hour, video games do not have "individual pages or chapters".
If you are refering to the footnote convension then I'm puzzled. Given that the entire article's claims are dependant on the game it would be impractical to put a footnote on every single clause on the page. After all, there are other existing sources. An example of were a general source from a game is use on the Typhon Primaris page, an edit you oversaw to yourself. I guess it's not impossible to put them by the subtitles, but I think you would agree that looks aesthetically unappealing, no?
It also appears my methods are in check with these existing pages:
-- Dark Crusade
-- Soulstorm
-- Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War II - Chaos Rising (Footnote exists but is not marked on the article body)
The 'Retribution' and 'Space Marine' articlesages are sourced with webpages but both were articles written pre-release unlike the others.
-- Secondat of Orange 21:33, 4 August 2011 (CEST)
- I really do not have the time to go into too much details. All articles need footnotes because you never know if and when additional sources are available for said article. So yes, footnotes are compulsory even if only one source exists. And in computergames while certainly not having chapters or pagenumbers (apart from the manuals of course), there are still missions, video sequences etc that can be checked for verification. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum 22:16, 4 August 2011 (CEST)
Please read this and give your opinion
Please read the following: Talk:List of Space Marine Chapters#This list contains several mistakes - we should deleted it and rewrite it anew. Thanks. Aehren 04:18, 5 August 2011 (CEST)
Welcome & Kestrel is back fluffing things up
I understand your point of view and I will stop as requested.
I believe (I’m not positive) the one posted on my page was prior to my first post, hence why I thought it was acceptable. It does however serve an important purpose; if they were to post without visiting the mainpage they unlikely to catch a warning and as a result may spam up the site like Kez did. I also see it as a good way of encouraging users to post and help out. Either way I look forward to working with you on this wonderful wiki!
Kestrel is back adding more fan fluff!
Your Brother in Ordo Lord Parvus 8th August 2011