Difference between revisions of "Template talk:IG Regiments"
From Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum
Matt Windu (talk | contribs) |
Matt Windu (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Okay, | + | Okay, New updated templates=- [[user: Matt_Windu|Matt Windu]] 19:48, 5 October 2006, GMT |
| + | IG Regiment Overview | ||
| + | ==Basic Information== | ||
| + | {|align=center border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |style=background:#4F4F4F colspan=2 align=center|'''Basic Data''' | ||
| + | |style=background:#4F4F4F align=center|'''Example Miniature''' | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |'''Regiment Name:''' | ||
| + | |'''{{{2}}}''' | ||
| + | |rowspan=12 align=center|Image:{{{1}}} | ||
| + | |rowspan=6 align=center|Image:{{{7}}} | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |'''Homeworld:''' | ||
| + | |{{{4}}} | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |'''Specialites:''' | ||
| + | |{{{5}}} | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | ==Recruitment & Training== | ||
| + | ==Battle Style== | ||
| + | ==Appearance & Uniform== | ||
| + | ==Weapons & Equipment== | ||
| + | ==Notable Regiments== | ||
| + | ==Minatures Range== | ||
| + | ==Sources== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Then for Individual Regiments: | ||
| − | |||
{|align=center border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" | {|align=center border="1" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 19: | Line 46: | ||
|{{{4}}} | |{{{4}}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |''' | + | |'''Regiment Type:''' |
|{{{5}}} | |{{{5}}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | |||
==Battle Style== | ==Battle Style== | ||
==Appearance & Uniform== | ==Appearance & Uniform== | ||
==Weapons & Equipment== | ==Weapons & Equipment== | ||
==Regimental History & Battle Honours== | ==Regimental History & Battle Honours== | ||
| − | ==Postings | + | ==Postings and Garrisons== |
| − | |||
==Notable Regiment Members== | ==Notable Regiment Members== | ||
| − | |||
==Sources== | ==Sources== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
----- | ----- | ||
Looks good to me, although we might need to change the box, what it looks like etc.--[[User:Jonru|Jonru]] 14:37, 5 October 2006 (CEST) | Looks good to me, although we might need to change the box, what it looks like etc.--[[User:Jonru|Jonru]] 14:37, 5 October 2006 (CEST) | ||
:Looks very good to me. Might I suggest posting this on the Lexicanum forum for others to approve? One thing, I would take out the linking brackets because this allows us to not link to something when we don't know it, instead of having to link to unknown or something. Nice work :) --[[User:Jonru|Jonru]] 18:17, 5 October 2006 (CEST) | :Looks very good to me. Might I suggest posting this on the Lexicanum forum for others to approve? One thing, I would take out the linking brackets because this allows us to not link to something when we don't know it, instead of having to link to unknown or something. Nice work :) --[[User:Jonru|Jonru]] 18:17, 5 October 2006 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 18:48, 5 October 2006
Okay, New updated templates=- Matt Windu 19:48, 5 October 2006, GMT
IG Regiment Overview
Contents
- 1 Basic Information
- 2 Recruitment & Training
- 3 Battle Style
- 4 Appearance & Uniform
- 5 Weapons & Equipment
- 6 Notable Regiments
- 7 Minatures Range
- 8 Sources
- 9 Battle Style
- 10 Appearance & Uniform
- 11 Weapons & Equipment
- 12 Regimental History & Battle Honours
- 13 Postings and Garrisons
- 14 Notable Regiment Members
- 15 Sources
Basic Information
| Basic Data | Example Miniature | ||
| Regiment Name: | {{{2}}} | Image:{{{1}}} | Image:{{{7}}} |
| Homeworld: | {{{4}}} | ||
| Specialites: | {{{5}}} | ||
Recruitment & Training
Battle Style
Appearance & Uniform
Weapons & Equipment
Notable Regiments
Minatures Range
Sources
Then for Individual Regiments:
| Basic Data | Uniform | Regiment Badge | Example Miniature | |
| Regiment Name: | {{{2}}} | Image:{{{1}}} | Image:{{{3}}} | Image:{{{7}}} |
| Homeworld: | {{{4}}} | |||
| Regiment Type: | {{{5}}} | |||
Battle Style
Appearance & Uniform
Weapons & Equipment
Regimental History & Battle Honours
Postings and Garrisons
Notable Regiment Members
Sources
Looks good to me, although we might need to change the box, what it looks like etc.--Jonru 14:37, 5 October 2006 (CEST)
- Looks very good to me. Might I suggest posting this on the Lexicanum forum for others to approve? One thing, I would take out the linking brackets because this allows us to not link to something when we don't know it, instead of having to link to unknown or something. Nice work :) --Jonru 18:17, 5 October 2006 (CEST)
