User contributions
24 February 2009
Talk:Fellblade
New page: :Hmm... is there a reason why we can't say the Fellblade is related to the Baneblade? First of all it was, second, because the few pictures of it that exist look a lot like the Baneblade.....
Talk:Reaver
no edit summary
-139
20 October 2008
4 May 2008
1 May 2008
Talk:Codex: Dark Eldar (3rd Edition)
no edit summary
+1
Talk:Codex: Dark Eldar (3rd Edition)
no edit summary
+229
Talk:Codex: Dark Eldar
Talk:Codex: Dark Eldar moved to Talk:Codex: Dark Eldar (3rd Edition) over redirect: Situation has been explained to me...
Talk:Codex: Dark Eldar (3rd Edition)
Talk:Codex: Dark Eldar moved to Talk:Codex: Dark Eldar (3rd Edition) over redirect: Situation has been explained to me...
mCodex: Dark Eldar
Codex: Dark Eldar moved to Codex: Dark Eldar (3rd Edition) over redirect: Situation has been explained to me...
Codex: Dark Eldar (3rd Edition)
Codex: Dark Eldar moved to Codex: Dark Eldar (3rd Edition) over redirect: Situation has been explained to me...
mTalk:Codex: Dark Eldar (3rd Edition)
no edit summary
+280
Talk:Codex: Dark Eldar (3rd Edition)
no edit summary
+254
Talk:Codex: Dark Eldar (3rd Edition) moved to Talk:Codex: Dark Eldar: Though the title is 3rd Edition, the details that follow are from the second and first edition, and not the third edition, which doesn't exist. There is a picture on the page (n
Talk:Codex: Dark Eldar (3rd Edition)
Talk:Codex: Dark Eldar (3rd Edition) moved to Talk:Codex: Dark Eldar: Though the title is 3rd Edition, the details that follow are from the second and first edition, and not the third edition, which doesn't exist. There is a picture on the page (n
mCodex: Dark Eldar (3rd Edition) moved to Codex: Dark Eldar over redirect: Though the title is 3rd Edition, the details that follow are from the second and first edition, and not the third edition, which doesn't exist. There is a picture on the pag
Codex: Dark Eldar (3rd Edition)
Codex: Dark Eldar (3rd Edition) moved to Codex: Dark Eldar over redirect: Though the title is 3rd Edition, the details that follow are from the second and first edition, and not the third edition, which doesn't exist. There is a picture on the pag
mTalk:Codex: Dark Eldar (3rd Edition)
New page: Once again, there was, and never will be, a Dark Eldar 3rd edition codex!
14 April 2008
3 April 2008
20 March 2008
5 March 2008
28 February 2008
Ordo Xenos
The Deathwatch
+46
Talk:Vanus Temple
New page: Gav Thorpe once posted this on Warseer: ''... I believe the Vanus were supposed to be a 'terminate with extreme prejudice' sort of Temple – kill you, your family, your dog, your dog'...
Vanus Temple
Moved this rabble over to the discussion section...
-1,669
22 February 2008
Talk:Reaver
DMfromhell says...
-1
Talk:Reaver
no edit summary
+24
Talk:Reaver
New page: Is this the same as the Reaver Batlle Titan?
Rylanor
Can't exactly be a "vehicle" and a "people" at the same time...
m-31
Fellblade
Removed the "Stub" I put on myself.
m-9
Fellblade
In the 41st Millenium
m+31
Fellblade
no edit summary
-35
Fellblade
Finished the Fellblade article, still looking for sources. I also need to check to see if my categories worked...
+1,090
Fellblade
no edit summary
+18
Fellblade
Added a page for the Fellblade. It's not mentioned in the Baneblade article and should be mentioned as its own article because it is both the predacessor of the Baneblade and the only space marine SH
21 February 2008
Super Heavy Tank
Space Marine Vehicles
+24
Super Heavy Tank
Added the Fellblade to the list of super heavy vehicles...
+46
9 February 2008
1 February 2008
Commorragh
Correct me if I'm wrong on this one, but the current Dark Eldar Codex hays "Second Edition" on it. Therefore, it's probably second edition, not third.
+3
Commorragh
Sources
Talk:Salamanders
no edit summary
+151