User talk:Inquisitor S.

You're going to have to be a little more specific here. Where exactly do I go wrong?

Here's my standing of the page:
100px

The page had no sources until I added them and unless video-media convension had changed in the last hour, video games do not have "individual pages or chapters".

If you are refering to the footnote convension then I'm puzzled. Given that the entire article's claims are dependant on the game it would be impractical to put a footnote on every single clause on the page. After all, there are other existing sources. An example of were a general source from a game is use on the Typhon Primaris page, an edit you oversaw to yourself. I guess it's not impossible to put them by the subtitles, but I think you would agree that looks aesthetically unappealing, no?

It also appears my methods are in check with these existing pages: -- Dark Crusade
-- Soulstorm
-- Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War II - Chaos Rising (Footnote exists but is not marked on the article body)

The 'Retribution' and 'Space Marine' articlesages are sourced with webpages but both were articles written pre-release unlike the others.

-- Secondat of Orange 21:33, 4 August 2011 (CEST)