Difference between revisions of "Template talk:SpaceWolves5E"
From Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Army lists are rules-content and therefore are not allowed. Stick strictly to categorizations based on the background. --[[User:Inquisitor S.|Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum]] 08:35, 9 January 2012 (CET) | Army lists are rules-content and therefore are not allowed. Stick strictly to categorizations based on the background. --[[User:Inquisitor S.|Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum]] 08:35, 9 January 2012 (CET) | ||
:I always figured that this type of template was useful simply to link together related forces of the same race/chapter/faction, not to actually create an army list. Would it be better if the title of the template was changed?--[[User:Ytokes|Ytokes]] 09:14, 9 January 2012 (CET) | :I always figured that this type of template was useful simply to link together related forces of the same race/chapter/faction, not to actually create an army list. Would it be better if the title of the template was changed?--[[User:Ytokes|Ytokes]] 09:14, 9 January 2012 (CET) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Certainly no mention of an edition should be made. Plus it should be useful for whatever edition you play as you are supposed to look for background info, not for artificial army list categories. On a different note it might be better for the overview if Non-special characters were separated from "troops". --[[User:Inquisitor S.|Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum]] 09:24, 9 January 2012 (CET) | ||
Revision as of 08:24, 9 January 2012
Army lists are rules-content and therefore are not allowed. Stick strictly to categorizations based on the background. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum 08:35, 9 January 2012 (CET)
- I always figured that this type of template was useful simply to link together related forces of the same race/chapter/faction, not to actually create an army list. Would it be better if the title of the template was changed?--Ytokes 09:14, 9 January 2012 (CET)
- Certainly no mention of an edition should be made. Plus it should be useful for whatever edition you play as you are supposed to look for background info, not for artificial army list categories. On a different note it might be better for the overview if Non-special characters were separated from "troops". --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum 09:24, 9 January 2012 (CET)
