Template talk:SpaceWolves5E

Army lists are rules-content and therefore are not allowed. Stick strictly to categorizations based on the background. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum 08:35, 9 January 2012 (CET)

I always figured that this type of template was useful simply to link together related forces of the same race/chapter/faction, not to actually create an army list. Would it be better if the title of the template was changed?--Ytokes 09:14, 9 January 2012 (CET)

Certainly no mention of an edition should be made. Plus it should be useful for whatever edition you play as you are supposed to look for background info, not for artificial army list categories. On a different note it might be better for the overview if Non-special characters were separated from "troops". --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum 09:24, 9 January 2012 (CET)

So name it Space Wolves Forces and have Special Characters become Notable Characters or Heroes? or should we just lose the two defining categories (troops and special characters) and just have the links?--Ytokes 10:16, 9 January 2012 (CET)

Or "Troop overview" or sth similar. Does not matter too much, but it should be uniform across the templates. As for the others maybe something like "Specialists", "Officers" or whatever. Characters is probably not ideal. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum 10:41, 9 January 2012 (CET)

I've started a thread in the Forum here to discuss army list boxes, as we need to apply standardisation across all the similar pages. Feedback would be appreciated. The Lemur 04:16, 1 March 2012 (CET)

Characters

I removed the "Characters" section from the list as it seems rather game mechanicsey - the only characters mentioned are the ones from the codexes. The other forces info boxes we re-did don't have the special characters section either. The Lemur 23:35, 21 June 2012 (CEST)