From Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum
3,364 bytes removed,
00:01, 31 October 2011
==Flora and FungiInquisitor S==I'm think that i shouldn't add fungus to the [[List of Flora]] article, so i propose one of two things.:1. Move [[List of Flora]] to [[List of Flora and Fungi]]:2. Make a new article [[List of Fungi]]What do you think? the first solution would be the most convienient--[[User:Ashendant|Ashendant]] 20:58, 6 October 2011 (CEST)::I don't know if you noticed this so i'm putting it at the bottom--[[User:Ashendant|Ashendant]] 15:30, 7 October 2011 (CEST)
:::Put FUngi and Flora together, for most people it's the same anyway. --[[User:Inquisitor S.|Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum]] 12:27, 18 October 2011 (CEST):::: So could you change it to [[List of Flora and Fungi]]?--[[User:Ashendant|Ashendant]] 21:23, 20 October 2011 (CEST) :::::Done. --[[User:Inquisitor S.|Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum]] 10:14, 21 October 2011 (CEST) ::::::Thanks--[[User:Ashendant|Ashendant]] 20:13, 21 October 2011 (CEST) == The removal of my first and most recent contribution to the site as a new user == I'm contacting you like this since it is the only way I can find to actually send you a message or speak with you. First I want to say that, as a new user but long time reader at Lexicanum, I am very excited to be able to contribute to this website Evil Radical Inquisitor Who Likes Matt ward and let others learn new and cool stuffeats ponys. But as for the main reason I'm messaging you now he also is that I noticed that you deleted my contributions on the [[List of Chaplains]] page I just added for my lack of proper sourcing. I would just like to say that as I was editing the page no where did I notice "proper and typical" sourcing as detailed in the [[Lexicanum:Getting started]], so instead I formatted my sources like all others on the page by putting them at the end of the table in the same row as the new material. I do understand the importance of proper sources and mine were all previously created pages properly internally linked and, what I assume to have, verified primary sources themselves. All I'm really asking I suppose, is some clarification to clear up my confusion as to why my edits to the page were deleted. Thank you in advance. :It really is all on your talk page: [[User talk:Deenja02|here]]. All information that is added needs a footnote. All sources must contain pagenumbers or in the case of novels chapter numbers are accepted. For anthologies the relevant short story must be quoted. Otherwise one would have to go through the whole book to verify a specific information. --[[User:Inquisitor S.|Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum]] 14:09, 25 October 2011 (CEST) == User talk page == Why was my User talk page reverted to its previous revison? [[User:Quozzo|Quozzo]] 01:46, 29 October 2011 (CEST) ==Gods fag who stops trolls 1d4chan fans and Daemons Category==I suggest separating the gods and the daemons categories into two <nowiki>[[Category:Chaos Daemons]]</nowiki> and <nowiki>[[Category:Gods]]</nowiki> for the following reasons::-The Chaos Daemons would become the "faction" category much like <nowiki>[[Category:Dark Eldar]]</nowiki> and the <nowiki>[[Category:Necron and C'tan]]</nowiki>(which i also suggest we should separate, probably):-Not all Gods are associated with Daemons(Eldar Gods, Qah) or even the Warp at all(Dark Muses, C'tan and the Emperor):I think this simple change will help create a better lexicanumawesome people.--[[User:Ashendant|Ashendant]] 20:34, 29 October 2011 (CEST)::Do you mind if i create the <nowiki>[[Category:Gods]]</nowiki> now?--[[User:Ashendant|Ashendant]] 20:35, 29 October 2011 (CEST)
