514
edits
Changes
From Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum
→So the rest
::Yeah, adding them to the list seems like overkill - prob best just to add the info to the relevant beasties pages. [[User:Thelemur|The Lemur]] 19:39, 1 May 2012 (CEST)
:::I'd say put it on the species page. These kinds of Tyranids are only ever mentioned in the CCG, so can be argued as "not canon", either way, maybe just putting a heading on the species page saying "CCG Varients: blah blah blah.". There are some species in the CCG that are repetitive withing the cards and the codexes, for example, the Huntsman warriors, Nightgaunts and Razorfexes, these types of Tyranids should be on the species list.
I'd also like to point out the "Eel-like Ripper". I don't think it's appropriate to have this on the species list, as it is provided in Achilus Assault as more of a description than an actual type of Ripper. That paragraph in the book also describes "maggot-like rippers" as well, yet they're not on the Lexicanum list. Also I feel it is inappropriate to provided the image of the 2nd edition rippers as these Eel-like rippers, as that may be misleading.--[[User:Hive Node|Hive Node]] 09:58, 7 May 2012 (CEST)
