38,021
edits
Changes
From Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum
m
no edit summary
:::::EDIT: Of course we could and should have a template named something like "Lost sources" for info that we can not verify at all as a note. But we should then actually remove all non verifiable content and send people to that external site to read u as we can not vouch for the info. --[[User:Inquisitor S.|Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum]] ([[User talk:Inquisitor S.|talk]]) 12:15, 21 November 2018 (MST)
:Of course on paper :D I made a mistake. Well, OK, I agree -_- May be somehow we will get a materials even for Steel Confessors (may be as a re-issue them by GW itself). Then I must again complain about that WebArchive don't have a HUGE info layer from the GW site (near 2007-2012) just because a pop-up language-banner that was presented on their (GW) site and was scrupulously saved by WebArchive - but we cann't proceed further after this banner in archive :( So much lovely information could have been waiting for us if it were not so... *Sigh*--[[User:Darkelf77|Darkelf77]] ([[User talk:Darkelf77|talk]]) 12:16, 21 November 2018 (MST)
::Having this in mind I've saved on WebArchive all pages from FFG site that was connected to Warhammer 40k matter (one-by-one) - they have some good background in 'News' pages. Just in case... Hmmm. I think I must do the same thing with the Warhammer Community pages - they also doesn't saved authomatically. Oh, dear...--[[User:Darkelf77|Darkelf77]] ([[User talk:Darkelf77|talk]]) 12:18, 21 November 2018 (MST)
