6,166
edits
Changes
From Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum
explanation for additions
I updated this with information I hope might be considered interesting and believe is relevant, but I'm not certain is the kind of the thing that is wanted here, apologies if it's considered veering off into no-no lands (the Four Humours section). It's pretty clear that this was the author's intent IMHO, but getting it requires out-of-universe knowledge.
Also, if someone else wants to read the sections in the novels on the Mournival and see if it's just me reading an inconsistency in the origins, Loken says it's been about since the early days on HR p.67, is told that it's an offshoot of the warrior-lodge on p.289, and Targost says it was inspired by Davinites on FG p.236. The LW's first time on Davin is put at 60 years ago several times, FG p.46 for example.
I suppose there are loopholes to explain it away without just being plain author error, but they involve making assumptions (ie Torgaddon is just plain wrong).[[User:Mob|Mob]] 12:11, 5 June 2007 (CEST)
Also, if someone else wants to read the sections in the novels on the Mournival and see if it's just me reading an inconsistency in the origins, Loken says it's been about since the early days on HR p.67, is told that it's an offshoot of the warrior-lodge on p.289, and Targost says it was inspired by Davinites on FG p.236. The LW's first time on Davin is put at 60 years ago several times, FG p.46 for example.
I suppose there are loopholes to explain it away without just being plain author error, but they involve making assumptions (ie Torgaddon is just plain wrong).[[User:Mob|Mob]] 12:11, 5 June 2007 (CEST)
