376
edits
Changes
From Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum
m
→Objection to source
I object to source #17 being used as a source. What BL people do in their private time and webspace does not constitute a valid source for main article content. And the header of these forums makes the reliability very clear: "The content of this forum is '''not officially endorsed by Games Workshop, Black Library or Forge World''' and no challenge is made to any copyright or intellectual property." --[[User:Inquisitor S.|Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum]] ([[User talk:Inquisitor S.|talk]]) 13:46, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
: I wasn't the one to originally include the source (I just updated it to an archived version), but this seems like a clear-cut example of a [[Warhammer_40k_-_Lexicanum:Accepted_sources#Examples_of_grey_areas_requiring_evaluation_on_a_case_by_case_basis_or_specific_disclaimers|grey area]](ignoring the fact that these aren't clear-cut by definition), as far as the Lexicanum's rules for accepted sources go. I assumed it must have already been discussed on the [[Warhammer_40k_-_Lexicanum_talk:Accepted_sources#Sources_requiring_a_discussion.2F_ruling|relevant page]], but if it hasn't, then I'd be happy to open a discussion for it. -- [[User:The Warmaster|The Warmaster]] ([[User talk:The Warmaster|talk]]) 13:57, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
