Changes

Question: [https://web.archive.org/web/20161205231219/http://z13.invisionfree.com/The_First_Expedition/index.php?showtopic=136&st=15 This source] (specifically the posts by [[Laurie Goulding]]) has been used on the [[Primarch]] page, as a reference for the Primarch rediscovery order. While it's a post on an unofficial forum (with the usual third-party boilerplate about its content not being endorsed by GW, BL, FW, etc.), it was written when he was still the chief editor for Black Library, and is explicitly said to be Games Workshop's official stance on the order in which the Primarchs were found (at to the timepoint of him saying it's not really up for debate). It generally seems to be corroborated by published sources too (see the dates, with citations, for the various Primarchs being found [[M30|here]], and the reference to the third Primarch found being one of the [[Two unknown legions|missing two]] in [[Wolfsbane (Novel)]]). Should this be considered an accepted source? It certainly falls into the Lexicanum's 'grey area' as far as valid sources go. -- [[User:The Warmaster|The Warmaster]] ([[User talk:The Warmaster|talk]]) 09:36, 17 May 2021 (UTC)