1,647
edits
Changes
From Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum
m
restoring a log, removed by an accident
The part about "female Custodes" should be edited out now until we get a proof in the BL books that there are indeed female babies who are being transformed into Custodes. From the current Custodex Codex (10 Ed) we know only about one individual Custodes who identifies as "she" without knowing if that person ever was a woman before and kept all the female parts intact after the transformation process. The message posted on X "Since the first of the Ten Thousand were created, there have always been female Custodians." is not considered an official lore and can't be referenced. The addition of the "female Custodes" by GW is done for political reasons, not to add something meaningful to the WH40K universe and therefore should be handled carefully.
:The fact that it's not meaningful and only to placate media and ideologues is not to be directed at us, only at GW. We add a bunch of meaningless fluff, the only consideration is whether the copyright checks out, and it does, since it's an official GW stand. Lexicanum as far as I am aware isn't affiliated with GW in any way, and even if I'm quite certain it has no decisive power, only the obligation of objectively adhering to its policies. PS: Sign responses with "<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>" --[[User:Brownpandanotgrizzly|Brownpandanotgrizzly]] ([[User talk:Brownpandanotgrizzly|talk]]) 15:15, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
: First: Please sign your (user) talk page contributions by typing <nowiki>--~~~~</nowiki> which will be automatically transformed into a time stamped signature.
: Second: Every attempt by which side whatever to turn the Lexicanum into a culture war battlefield will be mercilessly suppressed. There are clear rules concerning accepted sources and if something was posted on an official company channel then that is official. The question why something is written does not concern us whatsoever, we document. And we are certainly not getting into hairsplitting arguments what criteria somebody has to fulfil to be considered a she, he, it, Xenos or whatever. As long as the editor in question adheres to citation rules and sticks to what the sources say all is in the green. --[[User:Inquisitor S.|Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum]] ([[User talk:Inquisitor S.|talk]]) 15:50, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
