Talk:Felroth Gelt

The source "page 4" can't be correct. This page is the introduction of the book and only gives an overview about its content. Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk) 07:29, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

It is the correct page according to the numbering system in the pdf of the book which I own. Michel.eissa (talk) 05:45, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Then you must have another version than I. In this case we must find a way to more precisely specify the pdf-edition used. What does the page you use look like exactly? --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk) 07:23, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Pg. 4

So you are saying referencing this page is wrong? I wrote some content of the article based on information extracted from that page. Michel.eissa (talk) 07:44, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Yes, I also approve this page of book as a 4. I have the same.--Darkelf77 (talk) 07:59, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

I did not say that! I said we must find a way to distinguish different document editions! There is no use of referencing sources when people can't find them. So what does your page 4 look like? --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk) 08:06, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

@Michel.eissa: Please keep each part of the discussion to the subheading created for it, otherwise it becomes very confusing after a short time. Concerning the source and the pagenumbers you have me a bit dumbfounded with your statement "I have the same version you guys have". If you had the same version then your page number 4 cannot be correct as I posted our page number 4 here and it does not contain any info about Felroth Gelt. So which is it? --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk) 18:31, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

@Inquisitor S. Sorry about that. It is mentioned under the section: WHAT'S IN THIS BOOK? we can't use the introductory page as a source of information? it is still part of the book. Michel.eissa (talk) 18:39, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

I stand corrected and offer full apologies. And I will file a request for new bionic eyesight correctors with my local Mechanicus. I simply did not expect GW/FFG to be so devious to actually hide lore info on a product overview page. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk) 19:00, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

No worries mate. Respect _(._.)_ Michel.eissa (talk) 23:32, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Quote

The quote of (supposedly) Felroth Gelt is not presented in the sourced book (Dark Heresy: Creature Anathema). This quote presented in Codex: Inquisition (6th Edition) but without author mentioning. If this quote presented somewhere else with the title of 'Felroth Gelt' in it, please make proper source.--Darkelf77 (talk) 08:57, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

I have the same version you guys have and I agree with you Inquisitor S. about finding a way to differentiate versions. What about specifying something like ver. x.y.z like software. Did I write or do something that goes against the standards of the Lexicanum?

For the quote which one are you talking about exactly? I also don't have Codex: Inquisition (6th Edition) Michel.eissa (talk) 17:37, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

@Michel.eissa: Please keep each part of the discussion to the subheading created for it, otherwise it becomes very confusing after a short time. Concerning the quote it was a quote recently added by another user and since removed because it seemed as if the cited source was either completely phoney or the source is correct but the quote in a completely different part of said source. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk) 18:29, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

The quote question is not about your corrections.--Darkelf77 (talk) 18:41, 11 April 2020 (UTC)