Talk:House Van Saar
"Necromunda Rulebook" as a source
The first Source given is the Necromunda Rulebook and they refer to page 81 in it, but according to the Rulebooks page do it only have 80 pages, could this be a mix-up with the Necromunda Sourcebook that has 88 pages, and was part of a set with the Rulebook? --Gamiel (talk) 23:01, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- I think that this should actually be this rulebook here which has 312 pages and refers to House Van Saar on pg. 81: Necromunda (Hardback Rulebook). The content was however totally skewed, I have corrected both issues. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk) 09:17, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Addendum: Following up on who was reponsible for that I see that I have already retro-actively banned the user for inserting false information into other articles. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk) 09:20, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
"Uncited appearances" removed from article
- White Dwarf May 2018, pgs. 22-23 – Latest News : The Gang War Continues: Van Saar
--Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk) 11:53, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Necrons
"Who these beings are exactly is unclear, but they are likely Necrons" This is a contributor's conjecture not found in House of Artifice and imo it misleads casual readers more familiar with the races of the wider galaxy away from the more likely conclusion that the Iron Lords are some remnant of the Iron Lords of the Araneus Continuity. --Shards (talk) 11:09, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- 1.) Please sign your talk contributions with --~~~~ which will be automatically tranformed into a time-stamped signature.
- 2.) Unsourced or clearly (=checked) wrong allegedly sourced or extrapolated information can be removed without need for discussion. A corresponding explanatory summary should be made when saving the edit to make clear why content was removed. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk) 11:13, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- It really depends on the case. But if the source doesn't unequivocally mention "Necrons" it certainly should not be included in the main body text. If there is reason to presume it could be Necrons then that has to go (and be explained) into a "Notes" section and be clearly marked as speculation. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk) 16:14, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
