Difference between revisions of "User talk:Harriticus"
Harriticus (talk | contribs) |
Harriticus (talk | contribs) (→Please do a serach on the lexicanum before deleting info) |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
Could I suggest that you add a quick set of searches to your process. Otherwise, as I said at the top, very happy to see folks finding sources where possible. You do great work! --[[User:Zap1000x|Zap1000x]] ([[User talk:Zap1000x|talk]]) | Could I suggest that you add a quick set of searches to your process. Otherwise, as I said at the top, very happy to see folks finding sources where possible. You do great work! --[[User:Zap1000x|Zap1000x]] ([[User talk:Zap1000x|talk]]) | ||
| − | :I did search on both lexicanum and google. For whatever reason he didn’t show up [[User:Harriticus|Harriticus]] ([[User talk:Harriticus|talk]]) 12:16, 5 April 2026 (UTC) | + | :I did search on both lexicanum and google. For whatever reason he didn’t show up. Good catch though. [[User:Harriticus|Harriticus]] ([[User talk:Harriticus|talk]]) 12:16, 5 April 2026 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:17, 5 April 2026
Contents
Necromunda page AI image
Those 3 images on the Necromunda bounty hunter page definitely involve AI, the miniatures themselves and the original version of the photos are legit but they have been edited. If you look at them you'll see they're entirely lacking that grainy-ness that comes from having been taken from a photo printed in a while dwarf issue, It's very apparent they've been AI edited by how smudged, smooth and blurry details are. I even got out my white White Dwarf Issue 291 to make sure and there are clear differences between the two.
If you put them through an AI image detector you'll also see it'll come back as saying it's extremely confident it's AI. --TheVoidDragon (talk) 11:07, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- I checked the sources and the same pictures were there. The files predate the creation of AI image generation as well. Harriticus (talk) 16:23, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- The Images appeared in the article in 2024, that doesn't pre-date AI - they're not AI generated images but rather someones took the original photo from the 2004 white dwarf issue and put them through AI to alter them in an attempt to make them 'better' quality. They have the noticeable weird distortions, blurryness, affected lighting/colouring/shading, and mix of vague nonsensical detail in parts while other areas are too sharp and flat that tends to come with with images being AI edited/upscaled. --TheVoidDragon (talk) 17:52, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
Please see
Hi, please take a look at the discussion here: [1] about uppercase and lowercase letters in article titles. Your opinion would be appreciated.--Darkelf77 (talk) 10:01, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
Anhutek the Flayer?
Hello. I noticed in your recent additions for 500 Worlds that you list Anhutek as Anhutek the Flayer? Is this a copypaste error from Nezphettra the Flayer? KazilDarkeye (talk) 20:00, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
- Yes Harriticus (talk) 22:01, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
Templates and sourcing
Please note/remember that the citation rules explicitly also apply to any fields in any templates, thank you. Same as for any other parts of articles. --Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk) 08:56, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
Tau Notable Characters
Do you mind if I prune the [Tau Notable Characters](https://lex.124811.xyz/wiki/T'au#Notable_Characters) you wrote a bit? I'm thinking at least Coldfire, Lusha and Vorcah aren't very notable, and I think that Y'eldi, R'alai (who had a model, but very little lore) and maybe R'myr could go as well. This would leave codex characters, Puretide (who's mentioned everywhere) and the Kaises (who have games/novels featuring them heavily). Abies (talk) 20:17, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
- I think it’s fine to remove them all besides ones with models or rules, that makes them significant in my mind Harriticus (talk) 21:44, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
Please do a serach on the lexicanum before deleting info
Hi! Big fan of your work!
I noticed that you had deleted "Commander Wladislaw Pietrov" from Valhallan Ice Warriors page, and I was a little surprised to find that the name appeared within Pietrov's MK 45 - an existing page elsewhere on the lexicanum (for a relic from 8th edition, which I was then able to verify was real).
Could I suggest that you add a quick set of searches to your process. Otherwise, as I said at the top, very happy to see folks finding sources where possible. You do great work! --Zap1000x (talk)
- I did search on both lexicanum and google. For whatever reason he didn’t show up. Good catch though. Harriticus (talk) 12:16, 5 April 2026 (UTC)