User talk:Zap1000x

Welcome to Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum! We hope you will contribute much and well. You will probably want to read the Help section. Again, welcome and have fun! Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum (talk) 08:15, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Yme-Loc "ghast" or "ghost" storm

In the 8th edition Craftworlds codex I'm looking at, it has "ghost storm". Does yours say "ghast storm"? Might be different editions or regional changes, I suppose. --Mikaka (talk) 01:42, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

That's wild, I can only imagine why that is the case? Mine absolutely says "ghast-storm"! I'm looking at a US printed edition, so I don't think this was a language correction? A GHOST storm is a way more descriptive term, and if that's what's in your book that's what we should use because I can only assume it's the intended term. --Zap1000x (talk) 02:49, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Upon close inspection, it's slightly indented and is possibly a mis-strike? I was under the impression codexes were ink-jet printed? Definitely an artefact on my end. --Zap1000x (talk) 02:55, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Weird! Printing error makes the most sense, I've seen things like that occasionally in codices. --Mikaka (talk) 05:15, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Merichen

Hello. When you created the article for Merichen, I assume sources 9 and 10 are supposed to be 1 and 2? Also the name is listed as Arach-Cyn? Copy-past errors? KazilDarkeye (talk) 19:46, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Yes, absolutely copy paste errors! I'm so sorry, and thank you for catching that and all of my other errors. You're a lifesaver! If I may ask, what is your setup like to spellcheck these pages? I do my best to run it through a word processor, but you do so so much better. --Zap1000x (talk) 04:55, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

I don't really know what to tell you - I use a combination of the native spellchecker in my browser (which one depends on if I'm using a PC or mobile) and my own eyes. KazilDarkeye (talk) 21:43, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Dividing the sources within paragraphs

Hi. Take it not as a reproach, but as a friendly clarification. When we include text inside paragraphs, the link to the source must also be included, with multiple sources divided as I did in the article Pandoraque which you edited earlier. At the same time - this is a common mistake even for the seasoned editors so don't worry too much about it. Still, it is an important point for the accuracy of article source links.--Darkelf77 (talk) 11:17, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

I included the citations how I did because the creature feature article from which the initial citation was written had itself drawn the information from Inquisitor: Conspiracies - Heavenfall, so the second citation which was later in the paragraph (for Havenfall) was intended to cite all that was above it. As the text was an adequate summary of both, I did not see a need to change it for it's new source. This was not a mistake but an intentional change in source, as I would hope a future reader would be inclined to track down the more robust source on the subject. --Zap1000x (talk) 21:49, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Oh. In this case, yes you was right.--Darkelf77 (talk) 14:56, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Eldar Corsairs

Hello. Thank you for moving those command groups from the main corsair page to the individual warbands, but I think when you did, some of the citations for the Steeleye Reavers were messed up: there are a bunch of footnotes for source number 38 when the sources on that page only go to 3? Are those 38s supposed to be 3s? KazilDarkeye (talk) 19:44, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Whoops, no those 38s are supposed to be 2b's as they're all from the model advertisments in the Book of the Astronomican. Thanks for calling it my attention to it. --Zap1000x (talk) 22:36, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Talisman

Hey! Nice work adding those pages! Xporc (talk) 10:12, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks! But, the real credit should go to Shazrael for identifying the expansion in the first place. --Zap1000x (talk) 18:19, 17 March 2026 (UTC)