78,380
edits
Changes
From Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum
m
== Unknown Legions ==
Hi with the two unknown legions. i think that GW might hold a word wide thing (like the third war of Armageddon)to see what thier consumers(us!) would think should be the names of the two unknown legion's and thier Primarches. and also where they came from and what they did before the Horus Heresey and mabie after.
I like to say that i have ideas for both II and XI legions but i only put it on this if someone wanted me too. best to contact me :-)
thank you for your time
from Eagle Eye92
:::No, but it doesn't automatically raise them to it either. It's not firm evidence, you're just drawing meaning from semantics. Basically, the source you kindly provided does not provide information on the 2 Unknown Legions, it provides information on the Blood Ravens. If one were to place theories about the Blood Ravens' origins on lex, that should be done - cited and sourced - in their own article. And if one were to do that, surely their possible connection to the Thousand Sons would take precedence. There's plenty of grist for the mill on that subject in the 2nd and 3rd DOW novels. Thanks.--[[User:Mob|Mob]] 04:38, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
:::: I didn't say it automatically does, I'm saying they're '''candidates'''. This is why we're discussing it now and its not on a page to be edited over and over again. Thousands sons don't take precedence as it's just as well a theory as the Blood Ravens being an unknown legion. Thank you and goodnight. --[[User:Spysix|Spysix]] 02:58, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
