78,433
edits
Changes
From Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum
m
no edit summary
:Also, given that the materials were added a long time ago (but - from the canon source) and we cann't check them, we 'believe' that they were really taken from the mentioned source. In short we can neither confirm nor deny their veracity. PROPOSAL: May be we must create the particular banner for such a materials, which will emphasize that information of the article is 'conditionally' acceptable?--[[User:Darkelf77|Darkelf77]] ([[User talk:Darkelf77|talk]]) 03:15, 21 November 2018 (MST)
::@[[User talk:Darkelf77|talkDarkelf77]]: Unless I completely misunderstand you I do not see any need for a particular banner or to treat such sources as any different from other sources. Why should such a source be any different from let's say limited edition publications or for examle 1st edition books? Not that easy to find, sure. But existant and therefore perfectly verifiable. Why should we not be able to check them? As long as they existed at some point there is a chance that somebody of us has a copy. I think we have (or had and it is gone?) a list somewhere who had what (never complete of course). Presumably some kind of central "Source material request page" would be in order. Thoughts? --[[User:Inquisitor S.|Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum]] ([[User talk:Inquisitor S.|talk]]) 08:23, 21 November 2018 (MST)
