38,021
edits
Changes
From Warhammer 40k - Lexicanum
no edit summary
::@[[User talk:Darkelf77|Darkelf77]]: Unless I completely misunderstand you I do not see any need for a particular banner or to treat such sources as any different from other sources. Why should such a source be any different from let's say limited edition publications or for examle 1st edition books? Not that easy to find, sure. But existant and therefore perfectly verifiable. Why should we not be able to check them? As long as they existed at some point there is a chance that somebody of us has a copy. I think we have (or had and it is gone?) a list somewhere who had what (never complete of course). Presumably some kind of central "Source material request page" would be in order. Thoughts? --[[User:Inquisitor S.|Inquisitor S., Großmeister des Ordo Lexicanum]] ([[User talk:Inquisitor S.|talk]]) 08:23, 21 November 2018 (MST)
:::1st Edition existed. For example I have all scans from this time and could check truthfulness of information at any time. Materials, for example, about the [[Steel Confessors]] don't existed now (as of GW). They were presented by GW in 2005 year, but we CAN'T check it because the WebArchive don't have this page and the man who added information about Steel Confessors is also couldn't be contacted with. Were Steel Confessors presented on GW 2005 site? Yes they were. Could ALL information added in article Steel Confessors real and canon or it is just own fanfic of adeptus who added this page (and the page http://steelconfessors.angelfire.com/) ? We can't say. On the other side somebody who visited Steel Confessors article must be warned about that. That's my opinion.--[[User:Darkelf77|Darkelf77]] ([[User talk:Darkelf77|talk]]) 11:51, 21 November 2018 (MST)
